Editor-in-Chief Connie Guglielmo Resigns to Take Up Role in AI-Generated Content

Are you curious about the recent developments at CNET, a prominent tech news site? Then buckle up and get ready for an inside scoop on the latest changes in senior leadership, as well as ongoing controversies surrounding the use of AI tools. In this blog post, we’ll delve into various subtopics, such as the new position of editor-in-chief, mass layoffs, the use of AI-generated content, and concerns about editorial independence. So sit back, relax, and prepare to be informed and entertained.

New Leadership at CNET: Connie Guglielmo Steps Down

After months of speculation, Connie Guglielmo, the editor-in-chief of CNET, has announced that she will step down from her role. However, this is not the end of Guglielmo’s career at the media company, as she will assume a new position as Senior Vice President of AI Content Strategy and Editor-at-Large. This move comes in the wake of Red Ventures’ acquisition of CNET, a private equity-backed media company.

Adam Auriemma, the former editor-in-chief of NextAdvisor, another Red Ventures outlet, will replace Guglielmo. The latter outlet, a personal finance site, appears to be no longer active, as it has been fully integrated into CNET.

Mass Layoffs and Concerns about AI-generated Content

The news of Guglielmo’s transition comes soon after mass layoffs at CNET, which affected at least a dozen employees, including some long-serving figures. Sources suggest that the number of affected staff members could be as high as 26 or more, as the fallout from the staffing shakeup continues to unfold.

One of the sources of concern revolves around the use of AI-created content, which CNET has been testing for some time using Google’s language learning tools. However, after the use of such technology attracted controversy in January when ‘Futurism’ revealed that CNET had been using a machine-learning algorithm to generate news reports, the news outlet temporarily paused the program while an internal audit was conducted. It was also reported that more than half of the AI-generated articles contained errors and had to be updated with corrections. Despite this, Guglielmo expressed a continued interest in the technology, saying that the newsroom would continue to use AI tools to assist their staff in their work.

Past Concerns About Editorial Independence

Former employees of CNET have also voiced concerns about editorial independence being compromised under Guglielmo and Red Ventures’ management. Several ex-staffers reported that employees were compelled to adapt their content to please advertisers, with other employees tasked with developing ads, with an emphasis on marketing purposes and optimizing for Google search results.


In conclusion, the recent shakeups at CNET have sparked questions about the role of AI technology in news creation, as well as concerns about editorial independence and staff autonomy. With new leadership in place, it is unclear what the future holds for CNET, but these issues are sure to remain in the public eye as technology continues to shape the media landscape.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *